Well, the title says it all.
If you didn’t know I’ve got a professional type site as well as this rambling mess. Naturally I wanted it in search engines, thus I submitted the urls to Google and Bing.
Suffice to say, if you search with Bing, don’t. I’m no Google fan, and as an end user I must say several of their recent changes are a pain in the arse, but compared to Bing (Yahoo! For those not in the know is Bing now so it’s not worth mentioning) it’s fucking awesome.
See, seeing it from the webmaster backend confirmed something I’d long thought: lots of shit in Google what ain’t in Bing.
It works like this. In both cases you submit your url and are given a meta tag code, or a file that you add to your site to prove it’s yours. Now, theoretically this is all, but you can improve things a lot with a sitemap and telling the two search giants to use it for an idea what to crawl and when.
Well, there’s the first difference. Submit a sitemap to Google and you know if something went wrong in a few seconds. Bing can take weeks. No lie I’d had one sit there pending for over a month. There’s loads of discussions about it, apparently that’s just how Microsoft’s shitty code works. Are we really surprised?
Once the sitemaps are both there you’d think things would level out and all would become equal. Well, please note you already have been visible to folks using Google for hours, days, weeks or even months before Bing’s users ever knew a damned thing. For the users, please note you’ve been missing out on untold numbers of sites for that long. But that’s not all folks!
Bing also forgets shit! No fucking lie. I’ve a site I’ve had to sub,it the sitemap to several times. It’ll be there for awhile, then suddenly Bing’s forgotten it again. Another, the sitemap generating software I used was changed and the new software used a slightly different scheme, so I deleted the old sitemap reference and submitted the new one. Again, instant on Google (and indexed pages that hadn’t changed remained indexed I might add, Bing didn’t do this) and days for Bing. Well, every now and then Bing decides I have both sitemaps, or the old one and ot the new, or three references to the new but with different submitted page counts, and with some reporting errors … all with different submit dates.
Even when a site does get indexed and crawled, it’ll sometimes drop pages from the index (admitting this in the statistics you can view and with no damned reason given) and even when it seems to have everything properly indexed and crawled. Well, Janoke Greenbriar. It’s a search term that should find some references to Stolen Time since it seems fairly unique. You might also get some partial match sites too. On Bing you get exactly two results and neither are Janoke Greenbriar, they’re just partial matches, and neither are related to Universal Nexus in any way.
Again, I’m not really surprised, not exactly. No. But … there is a margin of disappointment. I mean the boys at Redmond might not be able to program Hello World (it’s a programmer thing, if you don’t understand just try to imagine someone who couldn’t write ‘See Spot run.’ correctly in less than six tries using a pen and paper and you’ve got just about e right idea) without it crashing or similar, but they could at least do a better job of making it look more like they’re actually trying.
Seriously. I try to stay out of e search engine wars ever since my favourite one, search.com, went defunct back in 2000, but I’m going to briefly violate my neutrality to say that at this moment the best, fastest, most thorough, most complete, and thus most useful search engine is Google. Others don’t count, they’re al either regurgitating Google or Bing results. The last one still independent was Yahoo and, as I said, it’s using Bing now. Ask is technically still working off of itself, but submitting stuff to it is weird, unreliable, and they’re crawl rates are so slow that they’re out of date at best … and I think they do rely, at least partially, on Google.